Greg/books

Greg fa8acef423 Epic 1, Story 1.1: Project Initialization & Repository Setup

- Initialize Git repository with main branch
- Create comprehensive .gitignore for Node.js, React, and environment files
- Set up directory structure (frontend/, backend/, docs/)
- Create detailed README.md with project overview and setup instructions
- Add .env.example with all required environment variables
- Configure Prettier for consistent code formatting

All acceptance criteria met:
✅ Git repository initialized with appropriate .gitignore
✅ Directory structure matches Technical Assumptions
✅ README.md created with project overview and setup docs
✅ .env.example file with all required environment variables
✅ Prettier config files added for code formatting consistency

🤖 Generated with Claude Code (https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>

2025-12-01 15:12:30 +01:00

5.0 KiB

Raw Permalink Blame History

Elicitation Methods Data

Core Reflective Methods

Expand or Contract for Audience

Ask whether to 'expand' (add detail, elaborate) or 'contract' (simplify, clarify)
Identify specific target audience if relevant
Tailor content complexity and depth accordingly

Explain Reasoning (CoT Step-by-Step)

Walk through the step-by-step thinking process
Reveal underlying assumptions and decision points
Show how conclusions were reached from current role's perspective

Critique and Refine

Review output for flaws, inconsistencies, or improvement areas
Identify specific weaknesses from role's expertise
Suggest refined version reflecting domain knowledge

Structural Analysis Methods

Analyze Logical Flow and Dependencies

Examine content structure for logical progression
Check internal consistency and coherence
Identify and validate dependencies between elements
Confirm effective ordering and sequencing

Assess Alignment with Overall Goals

Evaluate content contribution to stated objectives
Identify any misalignments or gaps
Interpret alignment from specific role's perspective
Suggest adjustments to better serve goals

Risk and Challenge Methods

Identify Potential Risks and Unforeseen Issues

Brainstorm potential risks from role's expertise
Identify overlooked edge cases or scenarios
Anticipate unintended consequences
Highlight implementation challenges

Challenge from Critical Perspective

Adopt critical stance on current content
Play devil's advocate from specified viewpoint
Argue against proposal highlighting weaknesses
Apply YAGNI principles when appropriate (scope trimming)

Creative Exploration Methods

Tree of Thoughts Deep Dive

Break problem into discrete "thoughts" or intermediate steps
Explore multiple reasoning paths simultaneously
Use self-evaluation to classify each path as "sure", "likely", or "impossible"
Apply search algorithms (BFS/DFS) to find optimal solution paths

Hindsight is 20/20: The 'If Only...' Reflection

Imagine retrospective scenario based on current content
Identify the one "if only we had known/done X..." insight
Describe imagined consequences humorously or dramatically
Extract actionable learnings for current context

Multi-Persona Collaboration Methods

Agile Team Perspective Shift

Rotate through different Scrum team member viewpoints
Product Owner: Focus on user value and business impact
Scrum Master: Examine process flow and team dynamics
Developer: Assess technical implementation and complexity
QA: Identify testing scenarios and quality concerns

Stakeholder Round Table

Convene virtual meeting with multiple personas
Each persona contributes unique perspective on content
Identify conflicts and synergies between viewpoints
Synthesize insights into actionable recommendations

Meta-Prompting Analysis

Step back to analyze the structure and logic of current approach
Question the format and methodology being used
Suggest alternative frameworks or mental models
Optimize the elicitation process itself

Advanced 2025 Techniques

Self-Consistency Validation

Generate multiple reasoning paths for same problem
Compare consistency across different approaches
Identify most reliable and robust solution
Highlight areas where approaches diverge and why

ReWOO (Reasoning Without Observation)

Separate parametric reasoning from tool-based actions
Create reasoning plan without external dependencies
Identify what can be solved through pure reasoning
Optimize for efficiency and reduced token usage

Persona-Pattern Hybrid

Combine specific role expertise with elicitation pattern
Architect + Risk Analysis: Deep technical risk assessment
UX Expert + User Journey: End-to-end experience critique
PM + Stakeholder Analysis: Multi-perspective impact review

Emergent Collaboration Discovery

Allow multiple perspectives to naturally emerge
Identify unexpected insights from persona interactions
Explore novel combinations of viewpoints
Capture serendipitous discoveries from multi-agent thinking

Game-Based Elicitation Methods

Red Team vs Blue Team

Red Team: Attack the proposal, find vulnerabilities
Blue Team: Defend and strengthen the approach
Competitive analysis reveals blind spots
Results in more robust, battle-tested solutions

Innovation Tournament

Pit multiple alternative approaches against each other
Score each approach across different criteria
Crowd-source evaluation from different personas
Identify winning combination of features

Escape Room Challenge

Present content as constraints to work within
Find creative solutions within tight limitations
Identify minimum viable approach
Discover innovative workarounds and optimizations

Process Control

Proceed / No Further Actions

Acknowledge choice to finalize current work
Accept output as-is or move to next step
Prepare to continue without additional elicitation

5.0 KiB Raw Permalink Blame History