books/.bmad-core/workflows/brownfield-fullstack.yaml
Greg fa8acef423 Epic 1, Story 1.1: Project Initialization & Repository Setup
- Initialize Git repository with main branch
- Create comprehensive .gitignore for Node.js, React, and environment files
- Set up directory structure (frontend/, backend/, docs/)
- Create detailed README.md with project overview and setup instructions
- Add .env.example with all required environment variables
- Configure Prettier for consistent code formatting

All acceptance criteria met:
 Git repository initialized with appropriate .gitignore
 Directory structure matches Technical Assumptions
 README.md created with project overview and setup docs
 .env.example file with all required environment variables
 Prettier config files added for code formatting consistency

🤖 Generated with Claude Code (https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2025-12-01 15:12:30 +01:00

299 lines
11 KiB
YAML

# <!-- Powered by BMAD™ Core -->
workflow:
id: brownfield-fullstack
name: Brownfield Full-Stack Enhancement
description: >-
Agent workflow for enhancing existing full-stack applications with new features,
modernization, or significant changes. Handles existing system analysis and safe integration.
type: brownfield
project_types:
- feature-addition
- refactoring
- modernization
- integration-enhancement
sequence:
- step: enhancement_classification
agent: analyst
action: classify enhancement scope
notes: |
Determine enhancement complexity to route to appropriate path:
- Single story (< 4 hours) → Use brownfield-create-story task
- Small feature (1-3 stories) → Use brownfield-create-epic task
- Major enhancement (multiple epics) → Continue with full workflow
Ask user: "Can you describe the enhancement scope? Is this a small fix, a feature addition, or a major enhancement requiring architectural changes?"
- step: routing_decision
condition: based_on_classification
routes:
single_story:
agent: pm
uses: brownfield-create-story
notes: "Create single story for immediate implementation. Exit workflow after story creation."
small_feature:
agent: pm
uses: brownfield-create-epic
notes: "Create focused epic with 1-3 stories. Exit workflow after epic creation."
major_enhancement:
continue: to_next_step
notes: "Continue with comprehensive planning workflow below."
- step: documentation_check
agent: analyst
action: check existing documentation
condition: major_enhancement_path
notes: |
Check if adequate project documentation exists:
- Look for existing architecture docs, API specs, coding standards
- Assess if documentation is current and comprehensive
- If adequate: Skip document-project, proceed to PRD
- If inadequate: Run document-project first
- step: project_analysis
agent: architect
action: analyze existing project and use task document-project
creates: brownfield-architecture.md (or multiple documents)
condition: documentation_inadequate
notes: "Run document-project to capture current system state, technical debt, and constraints. Pass findings to PRD creation."
- agent: pm
creates: prd.md
uses: brownfield-prd-tmpl
requires: existing_documentation_or_analysis
notes: |
Creates PRD for major enhancement. If document-project was run, reference its output to avoid re-analysis.
If skipped, use existing project documentation.
SAVE OUTPUT: Copy final prd.md to your project's docs/ folder.
- step: architecture_decision
agent: pm/architect
action: determine if architecture document needed
condition: after_prd_creation
notes: |
Review PRD to determine if architectural planning is needed:
- New architectural patterns → Create architecture doc
- New libraries/frameworks → Create architecture doc
- Platform/infrastructure changes → Create architecture doc
- Following existing patterns → Skip to story creation
- agent: architect
creates: architecture.md
uses: brownfield-architecture-tmpl
requires: prd.md
condition: architecture_changes_needed
notes: "Creates architecture ONLY for significant architectural changes. SAVE OUTPUT: Copy final architecture.md to your project's docs/ folder."
- agent: po
validates: all_artifacts
uses: po-master-checklist
notes: "Validates all documents for integration safety and completeness. May require updates to any document."
- agent: various
updates: any_flagged_documents
condition: po_checklist_issues
notes: "If PO finds issues, return to relevant agent to fix and re-export updated documents to docs/ folder."
- agent: po
action: shard_documents
creates: sharded_docs
requires: all_artifacts_in_project
notes: |
Shard documents for IDE development:
- Option A: Use PO agent to shard: @po then ask to shard docs/prd.md
- Option B: Manual: Drag shard-doc task + docs/prd.md into chat
- Creates docs/prd/ and docs/architecture/ folders with sharded content
- agent: sm
action: create_story
creates: story.md
requires: sharded_docs_or_brownfield_docs
repeats: for_each_epic_or_enhancement
notes: |
Story creation cycle:
- For sharded PRD: @sm → *create (uses create-next-story)
- For brownfield docs: @sm → use create-brownfield-story task
- Creates story from available documentation
- Story starts in "Draft" status
- May require additional context gathering for brownfield
- agent: analyst/pm
action: review_draft_story
updates: story.md
requires: story.md
optional: true
condition: user_wants_story_review
notes: |
OPTIONAL: Review and approve draft story
- NOTE: story-review task coming soon
- Review story completeness and alignment
- Update story status: Draft → Approved
- agent: dev
action: implement_story
creates: implementation_files
requires: story.md
notes: |
Dev Agent (New Chat): @dev
- Implements approved story
- Updates File List with all changes
- Marks story as "Review" when complete
- agent: qa
action: review_implementation
updates: implementation_files
requires: implementation_files
optional: true
notes: |
OPTIONAL: QA Agent (New Chat): @qa → review-story
- Senior dev review with refactoring ability
- Fixes small issues directly
- Leaves checklist for remaining items
- Updates story status (Review → Done or stays Review)
- agent: dev
action: address_qa_feedback
updates: implementation_files
condition: qa_left_unchecked_items
notes: |
If QA left unchecked items:
- Dev Agent (New Chat): Address remaining items
- Return to QA for final approval
- step: repeat_development_cycle
action: continue_for_all_stories
notes: |
Repeat story cycle (SM → Dev → QA) for all epic stories
Continue until all stories in PRD are complete
- agent: po
action: epic_retrospective
creates: epic-retrospective.md
condition: epic_complete
optional: true
notes: |
OPTIONAL: After epic completion
- NOTE: epic-retrospective task coming soon
- Validate epic was completed correctly
- Document learnings and improvements
- step: workflow_end
action: project_complete
notes: |
All stories implemented and reviewed!
Project development phase complete.
Reference: .bmad-core/data/bmad-kb.md#IDE Development Workflow
flow_diagram: |
```mermaid
graph TD
A[Start: Brownfield Enhancement] --> B[analyst: classify enhancement scope]
B --> C{Enhancement Size?}
C -->|Single Story| D[pm: brownfield-create-story]
C -->|1-3 Stories| E[pm: brownfield-create-epic]
C -->|Major Enhancement| F[analyst: check documentation]
D --> END1[To Dev Implementation]
E --> END2[To Story Creation]
F --> G{Docs Adequate?}
G -->|No| H[architect: document-project]
G -->|Yes| I[pm: brownfield PRD]
H --> I
I --> J{Architecture Needed?}
J -->|Yes| K[architect: architecture.md]
J -->|No| L[po: validate artifacts]
K --> L
L --> M{PO finds issues?}
M -->|Yes| N[Fix issues]
M -->|No| O[po: shard documents]
N --> L
O --> P[sm: create story]
P --> Q{Story Type?}
Q -->|Sharded PRD| R[create-next-story]
Q -->|Brownfield Docs| S[create-brownfield-story]
R --> T{Review draft?}
S --> T
T -->|Yes| U[review & approve]
T -->|No| V[dev: implement]
U --> V
V --> W{QA review?}
W -->|Yes| X[qa: review]
W -->|No| Y{More stories?}
X --> Z{Issues?}
Z -->|Yes| AA[dev: fix]
Z -->|No| Y
AA --> X
Y -->|Yes| P
Y -->|No| AB{Retrospective?}
AB -->|Yes| AC[po: retrospective]
AB -->|No| AD[Complete]
AC --> AD
style AD fill:#90EE90
style END1 fill:#90EE90
style END2 fill:#90EE90
style D fill:#87CEEB
style E fill:#87CEEB
style I fill:#FFE4B5
style K fill:#FFE4B5
style O fill:#ADD8E6
style P fill:#ADD8E6
style V fill:#ADD8E6
style U fill:#F0E68C
style X fill:#F0E68C
style AC fill:#F0E68C
```
decision_guidance:
when_to_use:
- Enhancement requires coordinated stories
- Architectural changes are needed
- Significant integration work required
- Risk assessment and mitigation planning necessary
- Multiple team members will work on related changes
handoff_prompts:
classification_complete: |
Enhancement classified as: {{enhancement_type}}
{{if single_story}}: Proceeding with brownfield-create-story task for immediate implementation.
{{if small_feature}}: Creating focused epic with brownfield-create-epic task.
{{if major_enhancement}}: Continuing with comprehensive planning workflow.
documentation_assessment: |
Documentation assessment complete:
{{if adequate}}: Existing documentation is sufficient. Proceeding directly to PRD creation.
{{if inadequate}}: Running document-project to capture current system state before PRD.
document_project_to_pm: |
Project analysis complete. Key findings documented in:
- {{document_list}}
Use these findings to inform PRD creation and avoid re-analyzing the same aspects.
pm_to_architect_decision: |
PRD complete and saved as docs/prd.md.
Architectural changes identified: {{yes/no}}
{{if yes}}: Proceeding to create architecture document for: {{specific_changes}}
{{if no}}: No architectural changes needed. Proceeding to validation.
architect_to_po: "Architecture complete. Save it as docs/architecture.md. Please validate all artifacts for integration safety."
po_to_sm: |
All artifacts validated.
Documentation type available: {{sharded_prd / brownfield_docs}}
{{if sharded}}: Use standard create-next-story task.
{{if brownfield}}: Use create-brownfield-story task to handle varied documentation formats.
sm_story_creation: |
Creating story from {{documentation_type}}.
{{if missing_context}}: May need to gather additional context from user during story creation.
complete: "All planning artifacts validated and development can begin. Stories will be created based on available documentation format."